Hva er Peugeot RCZ eller Ford Mustang?

5 grunner for å kjøpe Peugeot RCZ

1. Mindre drivstofforbruk (kombinert syklus)
   62% eller 8 l/100 The lower the fuel consumption, the lower the exhaust emitted into the air. Economical cars are also more efficient to drive.
   

   5.0 l/100 km drivstofforbruk (kombinert syklus)

   13.0 l/100 km drivstofforbruk (kombinert syklus)

2. Mindre drivstofforbruk (motorvei)
   55% eller 5.2 l/100 The lower the fuel consumption, the lower the pollution-causing emissions. Also, drivers save money by using an economical car.
   

   4.2 l/100 km drivstofforbruk (motorvei)

   9.4 l/100 km drivstofforbruk (motorvei)

3. Mindre drivstofforbruk (byen)
   58% eller 9.1 l/100 The lower the fuel consumption, the more economical it is to drive the vehicle. Also, economical cars are more environmentally-friendly.
   

   6.5 l/100 km drivstofforbruk (byen)

   15.6 l/100 km drivstofforbruk (byen)

4. Mindre vekt
   29% eller 401 kg. Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.
   

   1370 kg vekt

   1771 kg vekt

5. Kortere hjulbase
   4% eller 108 mm The shorter the wheelbase, the better the vehicle’s cross-country driving range. Also, shorter wheel-based cars are easier to steer out of a skid.
   

   2612 mm hjulbase

   2720 mm hjulbase

6 grunner for å kjøpe Ford Mustang

1. Mer sylindere
   4 sylinder mer. The more cylinders, the greater the engine stability with less vibration. Engine efficiency increases due to shorter pauses between strokes.
   

   4 sylindere

   8 sylindere

2. Mer motorkraft
   65% eller 297 hk The greater the vehicle's power, the better the acceleration. Also, powerful cars provide higher speeds.
   

   163 hk motorkraft

   460 hk motorkraft

3. Mer dreiemoment
   44% eller 249 Nm. The higher the torque, the faster the acceleration.
   

   320 Nm @ 2000 rot/min. dreiemoment

   569 Nm @ 4600 rot/min. dreiemoment

4. Mer motor kapasitet
   60% eller 2952 cm³ mer. The greater the engine capacity, the lower the wear and tear. Larger engine capacities provide longer vehicle lifespans.
   

   1997 cm3 motor kapasitet

   4949 cm3 motor kapasitet

5. Mer drivstofftankens kapasitet
   10% eller 6 l The greater the fuel tank capacity, the further the vehicle can travel without refueling.
   

   55 l drivstofftankens kapasitet

   61 l drivstofftankens kapasitet

6. Mer minimum bagasjerom kapasitet
   1% eller 2 l The lower the trunk capacity, the fewer items a driver can store in the vehicle without lowering the rear seats.
   

   321 l minimum bagasjerom kapasitet

   323 l minimum bagasjerom kapasitet

Neutrale grunner Peugeot RCZ og Ford Mustang

1. Motor posisjon
   

   Foran, tverrgående Motor posisjon

   Foran, tverrgående Motor posisjon

2. Sylinderes plassering
   

   På linje Sylinderes plassering

   V Motor Sylinderes plassering

3. Drivstofftilførsel
   

   Diesel Commonrail

   Flerpunktsinjeksjon

4. Dører
   

   2 Dører

   2 Dører

5. Lengde
   Ford Mustang 10% eller 501 mm mer.
   

   4287 mm Lengde

   4788 mm Lengde

6. Bredde
   Peugeot RCZ 43 mm bredere.
   

   1958 mm Bredde

   1915 mm Bredde

7. Høyde
   Ford Mustang 2% eller 32 mm ovenfor.
   

   1362 mm Høyde

   1394 mm Høyde

8. Fremre spor
   

   1580 mm Fremre spor

   1585 mm Fremre spor

9. Bakre spor
   

   1593 mm Bakre spor

   1654 mm Bakre spor