Hva er Volvo 850 eller Ford Mustang?

8 grunner for å kjøpe Volvo 850

1. Mindre drivstofforbruk (kombinert syklus)
   31% eller 4 l/100 The lower the fuel consumption, the lower the exhaust emitted into the air. Economical cars are also more efficient to drive.
   

   9 l/100 km drivstofforbruk (kombinert syklus)

   13.0 l/100 km drivstofforbruk (kombinert syklus)

2. Mindre drivstofforbruk (motorvei)
   26% eller 2.4 l/100 The lower the fuel consumption, the lower the pollution-causing emissions. Also, drivers save money by using an economical car.
   

   7 l/100 km drivstofforbruk (motorvei)

   9.4 l/100 km drivstofforbruk (motorvei)

3. Mindre drivstofforbruk (byen)
   23% eller 3.6 l/100 The lower the fuel consumption, the more economical it is to drive the vehicle. Also, economical cars are more environmentally-friendly.
   

   12 l/100 km drivstofforbruk (byen)

   15.6 l/100 km drivstofforbruk (byen)

4. Mer drivstofftankens kapasitet
   16% eller 12 l The greater the fuel tank capacity, the further the vehicle can travel without refueling.
   

   73 l drivstofftankens kapasitet

   61 l drivstofftankens kapasitet

5. Mer minimum bagasjerom kapasitet
   27% eller 122 l The lower the trunk capacity, the fewer items a driver can store in the vehicle without lowering the rear seats.
   

   445 l minimum bagasjerom kapasitet

   323 l minimum bagasjerom kapasitet

6. Mindre vekt
   29% eller 396 kg. Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.
   

   1375 kg vekt

   1771 kg vekt

7. Mer seter
   1 The more seats, the more passengers the car can carry.
   

   5 seter

   4 seter

8. Kortere hjulbase
   2% eller 55 mm The shorter the wheelbase, the better the vehicle’s cross-country driving range. Also, shorter wheel-based cars are easier to steer out of a skid.
   

   2665 mm hjulbase

   2720 mm hjulbase

7 grunner for å kjøpe Ford Mustang

1. Mer sylindere
   3 sylinder mer. The more cylinders, the greater the engine stability with less vibration. Engine efficiency increases due to shorter pauses between strokes.
   

   5 sylindere

   8 sylindere

2. Det er bedre kompresjon
   6% eller 0.7 The higher the compression ratio, the less fuel is required to achieve the same power. This can affect the engine's efficiency.
   

   10.3 kompresjon

   11 kompresjon

3. Stempelslag lenger
   3% eller 2.7 mm The longer the piston stroke, the better the engine’s fuel combustion efficiency. This reduces fuel consumption and creates a more environmentally-friendly engine.
   

   90 mm Stempelslag

   92.7 mm Stempelslag

4. Mer sylinderboring
   10% eller 9.2 mm The larger the cylinder bore, the better the combustion chamber fills. This provides power but can also increase engine emissions.
   

   83 mm sylinderboring

   92.2 mm sylinderboring

5. Mer motorkraft
   63% eller 290 hk The greater the vehicle's power, the better the acceleration. Also, powerful cars provide higher speeds.
   

   170 hk motorkraft

   460 hk motorkraft

6. Mer dreiemoment
   61% eller 349 Nm. The higher the torque, the faster the acceleration.
   

   220 Nm @ 4700 rot/min. dreiemoment

   569 Nm @ 4600 rot/min. dreiemoment

7. Mer motor kapasitet
   51% eller 2514 cm³ mer. The greater the engine capacity, the lower the wear and tear. Larger engine capacities provide longer vehicle lifespans.
   

   2435 cm3 motor kapasitet

   4949 cm3 motor kapasitet

Neutrale grunner Volvo 850 og Ford Mustang

1. Motor posisjon
   

   Foran, tverrgående Motor posisjon

   Foran, tverrgående Motor posisjon

2. Sylinderes plassering
   

   På linje Sylinderes plassering

   V Motor Sylinderes plassering

3. Drivstofftilførsel
   

   Flerpunktsinjeksjon

   Flerpunktsinjeksjon

4. Dører
   

   4 Dører

   2 Dører

5. Lengde
   Ford Mustang 3% eller 128 mm mer.
   

   4660 mm Lengde

   4788 mm Lengde

6. Bredde
   Ford Mustang 8% eller 154 mm bredere.
   

   1761 mm Bredde

   1915 mm Bredde

7. Høyde
   Volvo 850 21 mm ovenfor.
   

   1415 mm Høyde

   1394 mm Høyde

8. Fremre spor
   

   1520 mm Fremre spor

   1585 mm Fremre spor

9. Bakre spor
   

   1470 mm Bakre spor

   1654 mm Bakre spor